VFD and Minimum Flow Valve
We are looking into installing a Variable Frequency Drive for a Boiler Feed Pump. One of the issue is what to do with the minimum flow valve at the pump discharge. With VFD the pump may run at less than the discharge pr setting of the minimum flow valve in case of very low flow requirement, and the minimum flow valve may not operate at all. Anyone has experience with such a modification? Any suggestions?
I have experience of taking out the minimum flow protection completely
from a VFD driven pump, the pump was controlling level in a crude
seperator on the crude side so similar low NPSH requirement as per a
boiler feed pump and we were getting problems with the control of the
valve so we got back to the vendor who basically said tahth since the
speed reduces to control flow there was no way of going below the
minimum flow required of the pump. We had no problems after the min flow
was removed even at low flows because the pump speed reduced to the
point where the minimum flow required was always less.
In another
aplication we used a logic block to take the measured speed of the pump
and simply factor it to get the minimum flow set point on the min flow
control valve, again this worked fine in that case it was a water
injection pump so no NPSH problems but very high differentials up to 300
bar.
We've
been looking at VSD's on steam boilers over the past few years or so
but concentrated on some specific features required on the FD fan.
However, we are starting to look at the boiler feed water pumps and can
add a few comments that may help:
Note: I assume a modulating feed water valve is fitted..?
1/
From what we have seen so far, the range of the VFD when controlling
boiler feed water pumps is very small - around 40 to 50Hz (you can use
the same relative drop on 60Hz). Anything below approx. 40 Hz it is not
possible for the pump to overcome the back pressure of the boiler
including the pressure drop of the associated valves and fitting etc and
therefore no water will enter the boiler. So essentially you could
either ramp the pumps down to turn off or operate them at a minimum
frequency whereby the flow rate is low enough not to harm the pump and
or below the internal 10% relief designed in the pump ( Grundfoss
) - potentially No minimum flow valve required....!
2/
Alternatively - rather than a minimum flow valve ( which is usually
controlled by a spring & diaphragm ) perhaps try an orifice - the
hole size is calculated to meet the minimum flow rate of the
pump. Basically the pump operates at a frequency that is sufficient to
force the pumps minimum flow rate through the orifice back to the feed
tank when the modulating valve is closed. The VFD is controlled by a
pressure sensor on the feed water line so as to maintain a constant
pressure up stream of the the valve at all times and governed by a
minimum frequency set point.
I hope this helps. Would be
interested in your comments on this as it is something we are now
looking at as we (Siemens Building Technologies) design/manufacture and
supply control products to (mainly)OEM burner companies in the form of
burner management control, VSD's and other equipment.
Techcitizen (Mechanical) |
23 Mar 06 5:12
|
And thanks 'sed2developer' for your thoughts. In our case the pp discharge pr is 19 bar and drum pr is 7 bar, so we may be running at times at less than 40 Hz also. Regarding orifice, I feel it will always allow some amount of water to pass and hence not efficient. I also note that you have mentioned controlling the VFD so as to hold the pp discharge pr constant, this gives us one way of control. Another way is to take the open feedback from the different Drum Level Control Valves and regulate VFD such that at least one valve is held near to 100% opening (say 90%), do you think this can work?
Another issue is, one of the VFD supplier suggested running one pump at full load and the second one to run with VFD? Is this a good idea?
And yes, I still look forward to some idea from someone to overcome the min flow problem with VFD!
MORE NEWS